PatienteninformationÄrzteinformationGesundheitsforumKrankenkasseninformationKooperationspartnerüber uns  
 
   


Forum
Ihre Meinung...


Forum - Sagen Sie uns Ihre Meinung...
weiter...

Gästebuch
zum Gästebuch
weiter...
  Öffnungszeiten  
  Praxisleistung  
  Lehrtätigkeit  
  Workflow  
  Ausstattung  
  Fragen  
  Aktueller Fall  
  Bildarchiv  
  Links  
 

  Publikationen  
  Frequency of referral of patients with safety-related contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging
  European Journal of Radiology „Wir haben uns in diesem Zusammenhang mit der Frage beschäftigt, wie viele Patienten im MRT sicherheitsrelevante Indikationen hatten.
Die anhand von >75.000 ausgewerteten MRT-Untersuchungen ermittelten, interessanten Ergebnisse wurden aktuell im European Journal of Radiology publiziert. Nachdem Teile der Studie auf dem letzten amerikanischen Röntgenkongress 2006 veröffentlicht wurden, ein weiterer stolzer Erfolg für die Radiologie Löbau.“
  Marc Dewey,
Departments of Radiology, Charité, Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Tania Schink,
Medical Biometry, Charité, Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Charles F. Dewey, Radiology, Outpatient Centre Löbau, Poststr. 20, 02738 Löbau, Germany

Received 20. November 2006; received in revised form 19. January 2007;
accepted 24. January 2007
  Abstract Purpose: To analyse the frequency of patients with absolute and relative contraindications to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging who were actually referred to an outpatient imaging centre for an MR examination Materials and methods: Altogether a total of 51,547 consecutive patients were included between November 1997 and December 2005. Reasons preventing MR imaging were classified into the following categories: absolute and relative contraindications. Results: The referral frequency of patients with absolute contraindications to MRimaging was 0.41% (211 of 51,547 patients;95%CI, 0.36–0.47%). The absolute contraindications were shrapnels located in biologically sensitive areas (121 patients, 0.23%; 95% CI, 0.20–0.28%), cardiac pacemakers (42 patients, 0.08%; 95% CI, 0.06–0.11%), and other unsafe implants (48 patients, 0.09%; 95% CI, 0.07–0.12%). Also patients with a relative contraindication to MR imaging were referred such as women with a first-trimester pregnancy (13 patients, 0.03%; 95% CI, 0.01– 0.04%). Conclusion: Surprisingly, a considerable number of patients (0.41%) with cardiac pacemakers, other metallic implants (not approved for MR), or shrapnels are referred to MR facilities despite the well-known recommendations not to examine such patients. Thus, absolute contraindications to MR imaging are commonly found among patients referred for MR examinations and every effort needs to be made to screen patients prior to MR imaging for such contraindications to avoid detrimental results. Also, institutions placing implants (approved and unapproved for MR) should become legally responsible for providing the required information to the patients and their physicians. © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Safety; Safety management; Magnetic resonance imaging; Contraindications; Pacemakers
  1. Introduction

Patients with shrapnels, cardiac pacemakers, and some other metallic implants (such as cochlear implants and certain ferromagnetic aneurysm clips) cannot undergo magnetic resonance (MR) examinations because they may be injured in the MRenvironment primarily due to movement or dislodgment of objects made from ferromagnetic materials or excessive heating and induction of electric currents [1]. MR imaging on the other hand has gained pivotal clinical importance over the last 3 decades and is considered to be one of the two most relevant medical innovations [2]. Screening patients prior to MRI for the presence
of absolute contraindications is warranted according to recent guidelines [3] and has been shown to be cost-effective for instance in the case of orbital metallic fragments [4]. MR
examinations in patients with safety-related contraindications can result in serious injury [5]. However, the frequency of referral of patients with such contraindications to an MRexamination is not known. Thus, we evaluated the rate of patients with safetyrelated
contraindications to MRI who are actually referred for MR examinations as part of an observational outpatient cohort study.
 
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>
 
<leer>
<leer>
Bildarchiv
zum Bildarchiv
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
Aktueller Fall
zum Aktuellen Fall
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
Praxisansicht
zur Praxisansicht
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
Kinderecke
zur Kinderecke
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
Galerie
zur Galerie
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
Publikationen
zu Publikationen
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
<leer>
weiter... Schnellwahl:
<leer>

<leer>
<leer>
<leer>
Presse/ News
zur Presse/ Neuigkeiten-Seite
<leer>weiter...
<leer>
   
© Radiologische Praxis Löbau | Kontakt | Impressum | Startseite